Skip to navigation

Rother & Hastings, Winter 2017 Report

Thursday, 09 November 2017 18:04

Rother  suffers as a planning authority from a permanent  malaise – that of being always behind the curve.  Yes, it produced a core strategy back in 2014  with  what  is for the  South East a relatively  modest housing requirement, but according to the latest  planning agendas  is  down to  providing only a  3.1  year housing  supply.  I do not really want to blame the Council because it is house builders who are not  building out permissions granted, but the recent reaction to  this  supposed crisis is for Rother planners to recommend granting  any   application  that comes in the  High Weald AONB, no matter that most of the sites  up for approval were categorised  by the self-same Rother officers three years ago in their SHLAA as red (i.e. not suitable for whatever reasons to be developed) sites.   

So we see flimsy non planning arguments now being prayed in aid of this volte face – such as  ‘a building site brings employment’ – yes, but only temporarily  and ‘it will   produce Council  tax receipts into the  future’ – yes but  at what long term cost  to  both  the countryside and the community? And none of these are planning reasons for giving approval.

Not much progress on the Neighbourhood Plan front either because of a patent lack of enthusiasm for NPs displayed by the authority. Only two parishes have managed to get to Reg 16 stage and both have had to go to public hearings with an unknown result for both so far.

The only hope is that the delayed (because of lack of officer resources) draft Development and Site Allocation document will strengthen the environmental planning courage of the authority to ensure that it does its best to preserve what will now be left of the 83% of Rother which is included within the High Weald AONB.  

join us

Back to top